A polished demonstration often begins with artwork that is already approved. A useful buying question is what happens when a customer rejects that proof and requests a revised design.
Walk through a realistic correction
Choose a fictional job and ask how the original artwork is preserved, how a revision is named and how the operator identifies the approved version. Look for a process that keeps the old file available without making it easy to select by mistake.
Then ask what must be checked again after a layout change. A different arrangement may require another placement review even when the inscription stays the same. Avoid treating an earlier approval as permission for a materially different proof.
Compare evidence you can inspect
Write down what the demonstration actually establishes and what remains a documentation question. A clear correction workflow may be valuable, but it does not establish engraving quality, material suitability or production speed.
When considering AntBelt G1, use current project information to confirm available features and the supported setup. This checklist is a way to evaluate the work surrounding personalization; it is not a claim that a specific revision-management feature is included.
Explore related AntBelt project notes at /updates/.