Flat tags and round objects should not share the same test sheet. They answer different workflow questions, so the notes should make that difference obvious before anyone reviews the results.
AntBelt supports cylindrical engraving, but a curved-object test still needs cautious language. A useful note can say that the object was used to study placement, rotation, artwork visibility, and photo documentation. It should not invent final rotary accessory specifications, object size limits, throughput, or shipping details.
The flat tag column can focus on artwork scale, edge spacing, contrast, and repeatable placement. The round-object column can focus on orientation, visible engraving area, how the object was held during the test, and what needs another controlled sample.
Keeping the notes separate helps a backer understand the real meaning of a sample. A flat result can guide flat work, and a cylindrical result can guide curved-object planning, but neither should be stretched into a broad promise.
Back AntBelt G1 on the official Kickstarter page to review current reward details and campaign updates: