Flat tags and cylindrical gifts should not be reviewed with the same checklist. The surfaces ask different setup questions, so the sample notes should stay separate from the first test.
AntBelt supports cylindrical engraving, which makes round-object planning a useful part of the sample conversation. The conservative way to write about it is to focus on the workflow question: how the object is positioned, how the artwork is visually checked, what the photo shows, and what still belongs on the official campaign page.
That wording matters. A cylindrical engraving note should not invent final accessory specifications, object dimensions, material guarantees, throughput, or shipping details. It can simply say that round-object tests need their own setup record and that final reward details should be reviewed on Kickstarter.
For flat tags, the first questions may be orientation, contrast, and how the design sits inside the blank. For cylindrical gifts, the first questions may be holding, rotation context, artwork placement, and how the visible result should be photographed.
Keeping the two paths separate helps buyers and sellers understand the evidence without blending different workflows into one vague promise.
For more AntBelt G1 updates, see /updates/.
Back AntBelt G1 on the official Kickstarter page to review current reward details and campaign updates: