Material tests become harder to read when every observation sits in one paragraph. A clearer method is to separate material reaction notes from artwork notes. One section can cover visible contrast, surface response, and cleanup questions. Another can cover line thickness, spacing, and design readability.
This avoids a common mistake: blaming the material when the artwork was crowded, or blaming the artwork when the material needed more cautious testing. Early samples should stay specific.
AntBelt G1 content should keep that same discipline. It is useful to show pre-launch sample thinking, but not useful to turn a sample into a universal material guarantee.
When a maker reviews the next board, the split note makes the decision easier. Change the artwork if the design is the issue. Change the material plan if the surface response is the issue.
Follow the AntBelt G1 Kickstarter page for the launch reminder and final reward details: