Flat blanks and cylindrical objects should not be treated as the same test with a different surface. They ask different workflow questions, and the notes should keep those questions separate from the beginning.
AntBelt supports cylindrical engraving, so curved-object planning belongs in the sample workflow. The conservative way to approach it is to log the setup question first: how the object is held, where the artwork sits visually, what part of the surface is being reviewed, and what remains undecided before the idea becomes a public offer.
This does not require inventing accessory specifications, object dimensions, throughput claims, shipping promises, or material guarantees. A useful cylindrical engraving note can stay much narrower: this was a curved-object setup check, the result should be reviewed against the actual blank, and final details belong on the official campaign page.
Keeping flat and cylindrical tests separate also helps small sellers write better copy. A flat tag proof and a round gift proof may both be useful, but each should carry its own setup note, photo angle, and review question.
Back AntBelt G1 on the official Kickstarter page to review current reward details and campaign updates: